port_fail_pattern differences
Oliver Lehmann
lehmann at ans-netz.de
Thu Mar 23 05:45:00 EST 2006
Hi,
maybe someone from you know which one is the correct one and can change the
other one so that both are identical:
--- tinderbox-mysql.schema Thu Mar 23 11:39:17 2006
+++ tinderbox-pgsql.schema Mon Feb 27 10:13:46 2006
@@ -262,8 +259,8 @@
INSERT INTO port_fail_patterns VALUES (3300, '.*\\.h: No such file',
'__parent__', 0);
INSERT INTO port_fail_patterns VALUES (3400, '(X11/.*|Xosdefs)\\.h: No such
file', '__parent__', 3300);
INSERT INTO port_fail_patterns VALUES (3500, 'XFree86-.*\\.tgz',
'missing_header', 3400);
-INSERT INTO port_fail_patterns VALUES (3600, '.*', 'USE_XLIB', 3400);
-INSERT INTO port_fail_patterns VALUES (3700, '.*', 'missing_header', 3300);
+INSERT INTO port_fail_patterns VALUES (3600, '.*', 'USE_XLIB', 3300);
+INSERT INTO port_fail_patterns VALUES (3700, '.*', 'missing_header', 3400);
INSERT INTO port_fail_patterns VALUES (3800, 'pnohang: killing make
checksum', 'fetch_timeout', 0);
INSERT INTO port_fail_patterns VALUES (3900, 'USER PID PPID PGID JOBC
STAT TT TIME COMMAND', 'runaway_process', 0);
INSERT INTO port_fail_patterns VALUES (4000, 'pnohang: killing make
package', 'runaway_process', 0);
More information about the tinderbox-list
mailing list