port_fail_pattern differences

Oliver Lehmann lehmann at ans-netz.de
Thu Mar 23 05:45:00 EST 2006


Hi, 

maybe someone from you know which one is the correct one and can change the 
other one so that both are identical: 

 --- tinderbox-mysql.schema      Thu Mar 23 11:39:17 2006
+++ tinderbox-pgsql.schema      Mon Feb 27 10:13:46 2006
@@ -262,8 +259,8 @@
 INSERT INTO port_fail_patterns VALUES (3300, '.*\\.h: No such file', 
'__parent__', 0);
 INSERT INTO port_fail_patterns VALUES (3400, '(X11/.*|Xosdefs)\\.h: No such 
file', '__parent__', 3300);
 INSERT INTO port_fail_patterns VALUES (3500, 'XFree86-.*\\.tgz', 
'missing_header', 3400);
 -INSERT INTO port_fail_patterns VALUES (3600, '.*', 'USE_XLIB', 3400);
 -INSERT INTO port_fail_patterns VALUES (3700, '.*', 'missing_header', 3300);
+INSERT INTO port_fail_patterns VALUES (3600, '.*', 'USE_XLIB', 3300);
+INSERT INTO port_fail_patterns VALUES (3700, '.*', 'missing_header', 3400);
 INSERT INTO port_fail_patterns VALUES (3800, 'pnohang: killing make 
checksum', 'fetch_timeout', 0);
 INSERT INTO port_fail_patterns VALUES (3900, 'USER   PID  PPID  PGID JOBC 
STAT  TT       TIME COMMAND', 'runaway_process', 0);
 INSERT INTO port_fail_patterns VALUES (4000, 'pnohang: killing make 
package', 'runaway_process', 0);


More information about the tinderbox-list mailing list