Rogue NFS mount, chflags problem during installworld
itetcu at FreeBSD.org
Thu Feb 5 14:22:53 EST 2009
On Thu, 5 Feb 2009 22:01:33 +0300 (MSK)
Dmitry Morozovsky <marck at rinet.ru> wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Feb 2009, Ade Lovett wrote:
> AL> It'd actually be kinda interesting to get a poll on NFS vs
> AL> NULLFS. Whilst considerable strides have been made over the past
> AL> year or so in NFS handling, I can't help but wonder whether
> AL> nullfs should be made the default, and have a -nfs flag for those
> AL> that want to have their environments done with loopback NFS
> AL> mounts.
> I would vote for NULLFS being the default, yes.
Do we get one vote for each tindy we run ? :-)
IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD "user"
"Intellectual Property" is nowhere near as valuable as "Intellect"
FreeBSD committer -> itetcu at FreeBSD.org, PGP Key ID 057E9F8B493A297B
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 196 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the tinderbox-list