including RUN_DEPENDS in TEST_DEPENDS
Joe Marcus Clarke
marcus at marcuscom.com
Sat Dec 17 13:34:11 EST 2011
On 12/13/11 11:28 PM, Steve Wills wrote:
> While doing some testing I thought that it may make sense to include the
> RUN_DEPENDS in TEST_DEPENDS. Here's a patch which does that. Comments?
Is it always the case that tests require runtime dependencies? And if
so, should those not be listed in TEST_DEPENDS? I would think that
users not properly setting TEST_DEPENDS would be a problem and not
something we'd want to hide.
PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc
More information about the tinderbox-list